Paul Reiche and Fred Ford, the sport building duo in the back of the early video games within the Big name Regulate collection, have filed a countersuit in opposition to the writer Stardock, accusing the corporate of each copyright infringement and unfair festival on the subject of its use of the Big name Citizen highbrow assets.
Reiche and Ford filed the go well with in line with the lawsuit filed by way of Stardock ultimate December in opposition to the pair through which the writer claimed possession of the vintage Big name Citizen titles.
Along with the 2 earlier accusations discussed, Reiche and Ford’s counterclaim asks the court docket to claim them the homeowners of the copyrights for the primary two Big name Regulate video games and to cancel the trademark owned by way of Stardock that they are saying used to be improperly renewed.
Each proceedings reputedly stem from one core war of words in regards to the possession of the Big name Regulate IP and serve as a painful reminder of precisely how messy sport building IP rights can get.
Stardock bought Atari’s rights involving Big name Regulate at a chapter public sale in 2013. The lawsuit filed by way of Reiche and Ford say that acquire incorporated best the trademark rights to the Big name Regulate title and partial copyrights for the Big name Regulate name Big name Regulate three revealed by way of Atari (then referred to as Accolade) in 1996.
The 2 events publically butted heads ultimate December when Ford and Reiche accused Stardock promoting copies of Big name Regulate and Big name Regulate II on Steam, GOG, and its personal web page with out permission. The unique builders claimed Atari had misplaced its rights to post vintage Big name Regulate titles or use the IP when the unique 1988 license settlement expired in 2001.
That expiration, in keeping with Ford and Reiche’s fresh lawsuit, brought about all rights to the vintage Big name Regulate titles to revert to the builders when Atari (then Accolade) didn’t pay the creators the minimal royalty fee agreed upon within the report.
On the time of that previous war of words, Stardock CEO Brad Wardell defined that “many belongings had been transferred to us together with the more than a few publishing agreements to the Big name Regulate franchise,” pronouncing that, in brief, “the vintage IP is messy.”
In a while following that public dispute, Stardock filed a lawsuit in opposition to Reiche and Ford, claiming possession of the vintage Big name Regulate titles. This newest submitting from Reiche and Ford is a countersuit to these claims and accuses Stardock of copyright infringement and unfair festival.
Amongst different issues, Reiche and Ford’s counterclaim is looking for injunctions in opposition to Stardock for the use of their copyrights improperly, exemplary and punitive damages, and a declaratory judgment that the duo owns Big name Regulate, Big name Regulate II, their independently launched Ur-Quan Masters name, and the Big name Regulate characters utilized in Big name Regulate three.