Your article (Save you evaluate branded ‘superficial’ as previous choices overpassed, 16 September) was once based on a false impression of the phrases of reference of my unbiased evaluate of Save you.
As I’ve made very transparent, it’s an evidence-based evaluate with not anything off the desk. With a purpose to meet that requirement, I shall read about as a lot lived enjoy of Save you as might be described to me. On this evaluate, as in all others, the previous will tell the longer term. What I can now not be doing is passing judgment on explicit previous circumstances, nor on previous insurance policies changed within the years since Save you was once first devised.
I’m hoping that the responses to my name for proof (quickly to be issued) will come with actual examples of the overall vary of enjoy and observe of Save you.
Impartial reviewer of Save you